August 13th, 2009

wart

From Twitter 08-12-2009


  • 08:10:02: I hate it when my computer resets and the web browsers forget what tabs I had open.
  • 08:15:15: @eehouls I'm guessing it has something to do with the plan being instituted by a black guy.
  • 08:16:26: I think gravity has it in for me. Or for my CDs, anyway.
  • 08:17:53: Animals are always hiding in my room. And they tend to reveal themselves after I've closed the door.
  • 13:27:56: It's odd that people can paint Obama as a naive optimist when they seem to believe the insurance industry has their interests at heart.
  • 13:29:17: I don't think either political party has the monopoly on cynicism, though. And that's probably a good thing.
  • 13:57:56: I wonder if there's ever going to be a box set of the direct-to-DVD Futurama releases.
  • 13:58:52: @eehouls Because universal health care means you'll have to quarter troops in your house!
  • 14:26:30: Why does Liz Phair write so many lyrics about headaches? Is she particularly prone to them?
  • 14:50:26: PZ Myers visits the Creation "Museum" http://bit.ly/7m342
  • 15:05:40: @miscellaneaarts But I hated summer camp enough when I was a kid!
  • 15:13:10: I have an optometrist's appointment tomorrow. I sure hope I have to fill out another pointless form!
  • 17:45:27: I prefer talking about things to doing things. I guess I'm not atypical in this respect.
  • 20:23:33: http://bit.ly/YNmMu
    Rip-off characters
  • 20:24:03: http://bit.ly/KTIIT
    Things movie trailers need to stop doing
  • 23:12:46: Compared to MSNBC, CNN just seems so mild and moderate. I guess I LIKE liberal media bias.
  • 23:26:15: Shouldn't what's humane matter more than how much it will cost? It's amazing how many Americans value money over people.
  • 23:26:42: Guess what? If there aren't any people, there isn't going to be any money, either. It only has the value we assign to it, after all.
  • 23:28:14: I guess it seems to me that, regardless of the problems it might have, universal health care is the only moral option.
  • 23:30:32: RT @3x1minus1 http://twitpic.com/dohmz - techhie diffies on msnbc
  • 23:40:26: Come on, "Chris Christie" has to be a stage name, right?
  • 23:47:41: Would Trader Joe qualify as a real American hero?
  • 23:55:05: What could be greater than golf with a gator?

Tweets copied by twittinesis.com

Bast

Thursdays with Moroni, Part 2: Nephi's Nuts

All right, let's continue with our (or, rather, my) read-through of the Book of Mormon, with the book of 2 Nephi. This one makes another mention of the people who rejected its narrator being cursed with dark skin. In Mormon belief, the American Indians are the descendants of Jews who didn't accept the teachings of Nephi. This actually isn't a totally original idea on Joe Smith's part. I remember reading that, when Europeans first came to the Americas, they tried to account for the natives based on the mentions of nations in the Bible, and decided that they were descended from the Lost Ten Tribes. Maybe you already know about this, but while the people of the Southern Kingdom of Judah preserved their religion and heritage during the Babylonian captivity, and eventually returned home when the Persians conquered Babylon, the people of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were never seen again after their conquest by the Assyrians. The dominant scholarly belief is that they were simply assimilated into Assyrian culture, but there has been a persistent belief throughout history that they ended up in some unlikely place. The "Ten Tribes" description comes from the fact that the Kingdom of Judah was made up of two of the old tribes (specifically Judah and Benjamin), so that would mean ten that disappeared. In truth, some of the other tribes had already died out by this point, but I'm sure that's unimportant to your average conspiracy theorist. Actually, getting back to Nephi, he's said to have been a descendant of Joseph, and the Joseph tribes lived in the north, which had already been conquered by the time that his story is supposed to take place. I guess it's possible that his family relocated to the south, but I kind of think it's representative of Joseph Smith's (hey, another Joseph; I wonder if there's a connection there) general carelessness in forming his mythology.

There isn't really anything too original in 2 Nephi, which focuses on rules and prophecy rather than narrative. We do get a criticism of people who don't want to accept the Book of Mormon because they already have a Bible, with Nephi insisting that God hasn't necessarily finished talking, and that the book was written by the Jews anyway. I think he has a point insofar as God not being finished talking; why do Christians think God stopped saying anything relevant after the first century? I would, however, think that the Almighty would come up with something other than this historically inaccurate and openly racist revelation to a two-bit swindler. Not that the Bible doesn't contain plenty of inaccuracies of its own, but the fact that it was written and compiled so long ago means we can't readily find quite as much dirt on its authors.

Let's not forget the heavy dose of anti-semitism we're given in this book. We're told that "there is none other nation on earth that would crucify their god," which I'm not quite sure about. First of all, it was actually the Romans who crucified Jesus. Also, I'm not sure but that there might be other myths about people killing their own gods, although I can't think of any offhand. Anyway, the Jews will be restored to their former glory and homeland if they accept Jesus (this Nephi certainly knew a lot about Jesus for someone who supposedly lived half a millennium before the Galilean carpenter was born), but otherwise will be crushed to death by falling buildings.

A few other highlights of this book:

  • Nephi uses the expression "fruit of thy loins." Is that the company that makes magic Mormon underwear? :P
  • "Remember, to be carnally minded, is death." So marrying a bunch of teenage girls isn't carnally minded, Joe?
  • The following excuse for why a Jew in the era of the Babylonian captivity would use such Christian-specific language: "Christ (for in the last night the angel spake unto me that this should be his name)." Um, no, "Christ" wasn't his NAME, regardless of the modern expression "Jesus H. Christ." And why would the angel use the Greek term instead of the Hebrew "Messiah"? Or was this part of Joe's translation with the magic glasses?
  • More stuff about everyone who fights against Zion perishing
  • Several chapters of the book are simply copied directly from Isaiah, supposedly because Nephi's "soul delighteth in his words." I think Smith might have just needed some more padding. Seriously, if this is entirely necessary, why not just advise readers to look up the relevant chapters in Isaiah? I'm sure it wasn't exactly difficult to find a Bible in the United States in 1830.
  • Another choice quote: "For I pray continually for them by day, and mine eyes water my pillow at night, because of them"


It looks like the book of Jacob will be next. Isn't this fun? :P